ÐÂÔÂÖ±²¥appÏÂÔØ

RSC Beyond Access: socioeconomic inclusion report

Explore more:

Donate Join us

Beyond access: how socioeconomic background shapes the chemistry pipeline

Insights from a UK-wide study of chemistry undergraduates’ experiences, opportunities and career pathways.

Graphic promotes a report on the socioeconomic inclusion and its findings
Front cover of a report on the socioeconomic inclusion, showing people walking on a white background with "Beyond Access: how socioeconomic background shapes the chemistry pipeline" in the bottom left

Our research explores how socioeconomic background (SEB) influences undergraduate students’ experiences, opportunities and career trajectories in the chemical sciences across the UK. Drawing on survey data, focus groups and interviews, it shows that SEB is not a marginal factor, it is foundational.

Socioeconomic inclusion is cumulative, inequalities emerge early and intensify across an individual’s educational and career progression, shaped by belonging, opportunity, aspirations, progression and intersectional identities.

Entering a chemistry degree is an important step, but what happens next – in lecture theatres, laboratories, research groups, placements, professional networks and early career pathways – matters just as much in shaping the progression through chemistry education and into chemical science careers.

Read our latest news article on chemistry’s opportunity gap.

Download our Socioeconomic Inclusion report

What the research tells us about socioeconomic inclusion


1. Socioeconomic background is foundational

It influences early exposure to chemistry, access to resources, confidence, sense of belonging and retention.

Allow cookies to view content.

Figure 1. What impact, if any, has your socioeconomic background (SEB) had on your overall quality of life? (n=693)

2. Belonging is unevenly experienced

Undergraduate students from lower SEBs are significantly less likely to feel they belong in the chemical sciences, affecting confidence, engagement and retention.

Allow cookies to view content.

Figure 2. Regardless of your socioeconomic background (SEB), do you feel a sense of belonging in the chemical sciences? (n=693)

3. Aspiration is not the problem

Undergraduate students from lower SEBs show strong motivation and ambition, but face financial, cultural and informational barriers that limit opportunity.

Allow cookies to view content.

Figure 3. Do you intend to pursue a career in the chemical sciences? (n=663)

Summary of key findings

1. Identity is relative, contextual and intersectional. Understanding the career trajectories of undergraduates requires acknowledging their diverse environments.

  • SEB is not a marginal factor, but a major force influencing belonging, identity formation and the recognition of potential in chemistry. 

  • SEB intersects with individual protected characteristics, producing compounded and often hidden barriers that cannot be addressed through single‑characteristic based policies. 

  • Traditional data categories underestimate socioeconomic inequalities: high levels of ‘unknown’ SEB and the invisibility of care‑experienced students point to the need for additional evidence approaches. 

  • Students from lower SEBs bring strengths – including resilience, adaptability and motivation – which remain under‑recognised in current definitions of merit and potential.

2. Opportunity is not experienced equally, and understanding this requires acknowledging both structural inequalities and the lasting impact of lived experience across an individual’s career.  

  • Educational pathways into chemistry are socially stratified from an early age, with unequal access to high quality teaching, subject choice,encouragement and enrichment. 

  • Students from lower SEBs demonstrate high ambition and aspiration, but opportunity is constrained by structural barriers, financial precarity, unpaid placements, limited networks, and travel and relocation costs.

  • Unequal starting points compound over time, with small, early inequalities accumulating into substantial gaps in postgraduate progression, research opportunities and workforce retention.

  • Institutional support can mitigate these effects, but provision is uneven and fragmented, leading to postcode- and institution‑based inequity. 

3. Reframing higher education in the chemical sciences is not just to open the door, but to transform what happens once students enter laboratories, lecture theatres and research environments. 

    • Opening the door to higher education is insufficient if laboratory,teaching and research environments continue to operate on implicit norms that privilege prior advantage. 

    • Chemistry learning and research cultures that normalise long working hours, informal sponsorship and unspoken expectations disproportionately disadvantage students from lower SEBs.

    • Those facing hidden or unrecognised barriers require targeted, long‑term support embedded within mainstream provision, not peripheral programmes.

    • Inclusive departments, peer networks and visible allyship demonstrate that cultural change is possible, but responsibility cannot rest on individuals or students’ resilience alone. 

Evidence based recommendations for stakeholders' groups and partners

  1. Embed contextual identity into pedagogy and support by providing resources and training to academic staff to recognise how SEB interacts with race, ethnicity, gender, disability and geographical region in shaping learning experiences, and by replacing ‘one-size’ support with flexible, student-informed models that everyone can benefit from.

  2. Update data collection models to account for SEB and belonging by moving beyond single indicators, such as FSM, and include parental occupation, self-perception and lived experience to identify hidden or unrecognised contexts. Make belonging,inclusion and wellbeing explicit KPIs alongside attainment.

  3. Adopt strengths‑based definitions of merit by revising recruitment,assessment and progression criteria to recognise resilience,adaptability and non-traditional pathways and by providing students with guidance on expectations alongside accessible, subject-specific support.

  4. Ensure equitable access to enrichment opportunities to extend and share social and cultural capital by offering paid academic or industry-related schemes, such as lab-based internships, research placements and volunteering openings. Ensure that support, mentoring, career guidance and access to professional networks are embedded within the curriculum and available for all students. 
  1. Invest in sustained interventions and research by prioritising multi-year funding for longitudinal programmes that incentivise collaboration between schools, colleges,universities and employers. These should also capture identity shifts and experiences across the student lifecycle, including progression, participation in enrichment, post graduate transition and financial strain.

  2. Consider SEB when creating policies and regulations by encouraging the use of standardised approaches to measure SEB and by prioritising metrics on intersectionality, contextual identities and lifecycle understandings.

  3. Review funding structures to address inequality by expanding stipends,bursariesand paid pathways into research careers, and reducing reliance on unpaid placements or self-funded mobility opportunities. 

  4. Align funding with inclusive practice to reward institutions that demonstrate embedded, systemic inclusion and participation improvements beyond pilot programmes. 

What the ÐÂÔÂÖ±²¥appÏÂÔØ will do

We will:

  1. Advocate for sector-wide recognition of the importance of contextual identity, culture and norms by positioning SEB as intersectional and relational and by standardising language that moves away from current narratives towards a more inclusive vision of who can become and thrive as a chemist. 
  1. Act as convenors for cultural change by bringing together universities, employers, funders and policymakers to share good practice. Communicate opportunity gaps contributing to regional inequalities across chemistry education and careers.
  1. Amplify diverse student voices and promote inclusive practice by providing platforms where students can articulate their own SEB identity and experiences and where chemistry departments can share learnings and good practices. Investigate further progression routes into and through chemistry and explore how these relate to SEB and retention.
  1. Influence accreditation and professional standards by embedding expectations and initiatives that actively target individuals from diverse SEBs, and by recognising inclusive practice beyond access alone. Use these findings and future related research to inform the continual evolution of RSC accreditation and professional standards development to ensure both remain relevant to the community it serves.
  1. Ensure equitable access to student opportunities by making RSC initiatives, such as free membership, career services and professional networks accessible to all students. Actively recruit those students less likely to self-select into these opportunities. Raise awareness of the support available to students experiencing financial hardship from the RSC's Chemists’ Community Fund.

Call to action

  1. Help others benefit from these insights – share this report with your network today.

  2. How to reference this research: ÐÂÔÂÖ±²¥appÏÂÔØ (2026) Beyond access: how socioeconomic background shapes the chemistry pipeline. 

  3. Who can improve socioeconomic inclusion in the chemical sciences? You can

We support innovative projects, activities and research that make the chemical sciences community more inclusive and diverse.

Apply to the Inclusion and Diversity Fund

Practical resources to support undergraduate students

Explore evidence‑based resources and practical support for undergraduate students, designed to strengthen inclusion and diversity across the chemical sciences.

Free RSC membership

For undergraduate students in the UK, Ireland, and all international RSC-accredited institutions. Use code CATALYST100 at checkout.

Professional Development at the RSC

Take charge of your career in the chemical sciences from skills training and mentoring to grants and career planning tools.

Chemists’ Community Fund

We provide support of all kinds: financial, wellbeing, health or social. Whatever you need, we can provide impartial information, helpful connections and support you can count on.

Webinar | Chemistry World

Empowering voices: Advancing social mobility in the chemical sciences.

Opinion | Chemistry World

Nurturing socioeconomic inclusion for a brighter tomorrow.

News | Chemistry World

Chemistry World article to coincide with the launch of the Socioeconomic Inclusion report. [coming soon]

How to connect with us and get involved

Contact our Inclusion and Diversity team

We're here to help. Get in touch if you have any questions about inclusion and diversity in the chemical sciences or at the ÐÂÔÂÖ±²¥appÏÂÔØ.

Further reading

Our Inclusion and Diversity team has produced a series of reports examining gender, race and ethnic inequalities, sexuality, disability, neurodiversity, and inclusion, as part of our ongoing commitment to building a healthier and more inclusive culture across the chemical sciences. These studies sit within our Inclusion and Diversity strategy to 2030, shaping an inclusive future for the chemical sciences, and provide evidence‑based insights alongside practical actions for change.

Related pages